Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Matematika Anak Usia Dini  Menggunakan Model CIPP

Yelva Nofriyanti; Ambiyar Ambiyar

Yelva Nofriyanti Universitas Adzkia
Ambiyar Ambiyar Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract

Pembelajaran matematika pada anak usia dini berperan penting dalam membangun kemampuan numerasi, berpikir logis, dan pemecahan masalah. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan evaluasi program pembelajaran yang komprehensif untuk menjamin kualitas pelaksanaannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi program pembelajaran matematika anak usia dini menggunakan Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain evaluatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi pembelajaran, dan studi dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis secara interaktif berdasarkan komponen CIPP. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tujuan pembelajaran matematika telah mengacu pada kurikulum, namun belum dirumuskan secara operasional. Kompetensi pedagogik guru dan pemanfaatan media pembelajaran masih perlu ditingkatkan. Proses pembelajaran telah berbasis bermain, tetapi belum optimal dalam mendorong eksplorasi dan penalaran anak. Pada aspek produk, sebagian besar anak mencapai indikator matematika dasar, namun kemampuan berpikir logis belum merata. Model CIPP efektif untuk mengidentifikasi kekuatan, kelemahan, dan area perbaikan program pembelajaran matematika anak usia dini.

References

Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Charlesworth, R. (2012). Math and science for young children (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 1–3.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories. AMEE Guide, 67, 1–18.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

McAfee, O., Leong, D. J., & Bodrova, E. (2016). Assessing and guiding young children’s development and learning (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2018). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York: Guilford Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2020). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (4th ed.). Washington, DC: NAEYC.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2013). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 145–156.

Seefeldt, C., & Wasik, B. A. (2008). Education of young children (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002). CIPP evaluation model checklist. Kalamazoo, MI: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. New York: Guilford Press.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thiel, O., Severina, E., & Perry, B. (2021). Early childhood mathematics pedagogy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(1), 5–17.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2017). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wortham, S. C. (2011). Assessment in early childhood education (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Wortham, S. C., & Hardin, B. J. (2016). Assessment in early childhood education (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the CIPP evaluation model as a comprehensive framework. Journal of Education and Evaluation, 4(1), 57–75.