Dialektika Paradigma Ilmu Sosial Dalam Strategi Research Marketing

  • Edi Suandi STES (Sekolah Tinggi Ekonomi Syariah ) Manna Wa Salwa

Abstract

Abstract


The purpose of writing this article is to explore Friedrich Engels's dialectics, as a central figure in the dialectical thinking method. With the discovery or a new theory called a thesis which is then opposed to the antithesis, which subsequently produces a synthesis or a new thesis. Hegel's way of thinking is called the dialectical method to understand a problem that is based on the law of reason. Hegel's dialectical thinking includes three branches of philosophy, namely: logic, natural philosophy, and spirit philosophy. Logic is a philosophy of ideas, natural philosophy is a philosophy of ideas as its manifestation in nature, spirit philosophy is a philosophy of ideas that goes back to itself.


 


Burrel and Morgan (1979) divide the research paradigm into four paradigms, namely functionalist paradigm, interpretive paradigm, radical humanist paradigm and radical structuralist paradigm. Paradigmapping in a marketing research strategy has two main advantages and consequences: First, it provides a territorial map to develop a research strategy that seeks to develop understanding, rather than merely producing additional knowledge and information. Second, paradigmapping enables researchers to implement research strategies that can go beyond arguments that are "incomparable" that are destructive and include strategic choices that can be characterized as "paradigm of parochialism", "inculcation of paradigm", "paradigm shift", "paradigm crossing " or " paradigm transcendence ".


 


The paradigm that holds that marketing is merely a transaction, which only has a main orientation towards the company's efforts to achieve as many sales as possible is no longer appropriate for the development of life and current marketing practices. When the marketing guideline is how the company can achieve the highest level of sales through exchanges or transactions and how to get the maximum profit, the ways taken to learn marketing science are many referring to and referring to the marketing mix concept (marketing mix ) with popular variables namely 4Ps, namely product, price, place (distribution channel), promotion (promotion, communication).


 


Transaction marketing theory and the 4Ps variable has upset many marketing experts in the 1990s, especially from the Nordick and United Kingdom regions, because the facts on the ground regarding the practice of applying the concept using 4Ps are not always appropriate and can be misleading, this is very pronounced once for service marketing and industrial marketing that demands other concepts that are more appropriate or appropriate to the conditions faced in real terms. The situation above has led to the birth of a new paradigm, namely marketing relationships. Marketing relationship is a form and marketing practice that emphasizes the importance of a partnership relationship between marketers or companies with customers in the long term time horizon.


 


The Marketing Thesis mix and 4Ps were challenged (Anti Thesis) in the marketing paradigm from the 1990s to the present. According to Gronroos (1994) the paradigm is weak and has a negative effect on marketing research and practice. The concept of marketing mix, with the phenomenon of 4Ps, is not always appropriate and relevant to various situations in marketing research. Practitioners and academics feel a variety of limitations with the concept of the 4 Ps variable so that later additional various P variables appear, such as Kotler in the mega-marketing article with public relations and politics, as an extension of 4Ps. Next Booms and Bitner (1982) added 3 Ps, namely people, physical evidence and process. With regard to the addition of the P variable, it turns out that it still cannot meet the needs of industry and services in the marketing sector. This means there is something missing. Challenges in today's contemporary research world, such as service marketing, industrial marketing show a condition for new approaches as Synthesis is based on the ability to build and manage relationships or partnerships with customers, because it requires a new paradigm in marketing. Business and marketing are activities, both of which are built in order to create a long-term relationship and can mutually benefit or benefit those who have an interest (stakeholders). For this reason, a new paradigm in marketing is needed that marketing that can build relationships that can provide value and benefits and can bring together various stakeholders and have a long time horizon is important. The new paradigm or concept that was born and emerged was marketing relationship as the Syntesis.

References

Abercrombie, N. (1994), “Authority and consumer society'', in Keat, R., Whiteley, N. And Abercrombie, N. (Eds), The Authority of the Consumer, Routledge, London.

Adams, G. and White, J. (1994), “Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: an assessment of methods and quality”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 54 No. 6, pp. 565-576

Andreasen, A.R. (2006), Social Marketing in the 21st Century, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Agger, Ben, Critical Social Theories, An Introduction, Second Edition, Boulder USA:Paradigm Publishers, 2006.

Alderson, W. (1957), Marketing Behaviour and Executive Action a Functionalist Approach to Marketing Theory, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood.

Ardley, B.C. and Quinn, L. (2014), “Practitioner accounts and knowledge production: an analysis of three marketing discourses”, Marketing Theory, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 97-118.

Armstrong, P. and Lilley, S. (2008), “Practical criticism and the social sciences of management”,Ephemera, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 353-370.

Alderson, W. and Cox, R. (1948), “Towards a theory of marketing'', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 13, October, pp. 137-52.

Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (1996), Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction, Sage, London.

Arndt, J. (1978), ``How broad should the marketing concept be?'', Journal of Marketing, January, pp. 101-3.

Arndt, J. (1985), ``On making marketing science more scientific: the role of observations, paradigms, metaphors and puzzle solving'', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, pp. 11-23.

Alvesson, M. (1994), “Critical theory and consumer marketing”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 291-313.

Arndt, J. (1985), “On making marketing science more scientific: the role of observations, paradigms, metaphors and puzzle solving”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, Summer, pp. 11-23.

Bertens, K., Ringkasan Sejarah Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1998.

Burrell, G. dan G. Morgan, Sociolocal Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Arena, 1994.

Bakan, J. (2016), “Social marketing: thoughts from an empathetic outsider”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 32 Nos 11/12, pp. 1183-1189.

Baumgartner, H. and Pieters, R. (2003), “The structural influence of marketing journals: a citation analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67 No. 2, pp. 123-139.

Bamm, Archie J (1984) What Is Science?, makalah. Blalock Jr, Hubert M ,(1990), Basic Dilemmas in the Social Sciences, Sage Publications, London.

Bolton et al (2004), Invited Commentaries on “Evolving to A New Dominant Logic For Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol 68 (January), 18-27.

Bolton et al (2005), Marketing Renaissance: Opportunities and Imperatives for Improving Marketing Thought, Practice and Infrastructure, Journal of Marketing, Vol 69, h 1-25.

Burrel G dan G Morgan (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, London, Heinemann.

Baker, S. and Holt, S. (2004), “Making marketers accountable: a failure of marketing education”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 557-567.

Barley, S.R. and Kunda, G. (1992), “Design and devotion: surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 363-399.

Belk, R.W., Wallendorf, M. and Sherry, J.F. (1989), “The sacred and the profane in consumer behaviour: theodicy on the odyssey”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1-37.

Boje, D.A. (2008), Storytelling Organizations, Sage Publications, London. Borghini

Brown, S. (1995), Post-Modern Marketing, Routledge, London.

Brown, S. (2010), “The theory-practice divide: thoughts from the editors and senior advisory board of EJM”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44 Nos 1/2, pp. 5-20.

Brownlie, D. (1997), “Beyond ethnography: towards writerly accounts of organising in marketing”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 Nos 3/4, pp. 263-282.

Bryman, A. (2012), Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Buttle, F.A. (1994), ``New paradigm research in marketing'', European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 8/9, pp. 8-11.

Belk, R.W. and Zaltman, G. (1987), ``Marketing theory'', AMA Winter Educators' Conference, San Antonio, TX.

Berry, L.L. (1993), ``Our roles as educators: present and future'', Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 3-8.

Bird, D. (1996), ``Education would be the death of good marketing'', Marketing, 5 December, p. 14.

Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction, Routledge, London.

Bourdieu, P. (1990), In Other Words: Towards a Reflexive Sociology, Polity, Cambridge.

Bronner, S.E. and Kellner, D.M. (1989), Critical Theory and Society, Routledge, London.

Brown, S. (1995), Postmodern Marketing, Routledge, London.

Brown, S. (1996), ``Art or science? Fifty years of marketing debate'', Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 243-68.

Brown, S. (1997), Postmodern Marketing 2: Telling Tales, International Thomson Press, London.

Brown, S.W., Fisk, R.P. and Bitner, M.J. (1994), ``The development and emergence of services marketing thought'', International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-19.

Brownlie, D. (1997), ``Beynond ethnography towards writerly accounts of organizing in marketing'', European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 No. 3/4, pp. 1-16.

Brownlie, D. and Saren, M. (1995), ``On the commodification of marketing knowledge: opening themes'', Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 619-27.

Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (1994), ``The new marketing myopia: critical perspectives on theory and research in marketing'', European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 3.

Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (1999), ``Marketing disequilibrium: on redress and restoration'', in Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (Eds) Rethinking Marketing, Sage, London.

Bush, R.F. and Hunt, S.D. (1982), ``Marketing theory: philosophy of science perspectives'', AMA Conference Proceedings, AMA, Chicago, IL.

Baker, M.J. (1995), ``A comment on: the commodification of marketing knowledge'', Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 11, pp. 629-34.

Baker, M.J. (1999), ``In the market for some hard-sell techniques'', The Times Higher, 26 February, p. XIV.

Barrett, L.R. (1997), ``On students as customers ± some warnings from America'', Journal of Further and Higher Education, pp. 70-3.

Bartels, R. (1976) The History of Marketing Thought, Grid, Columbus, OH.

Bartels, R. (1983), ``Is marketing detailing its responsibilities?'', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 32-5. Baudrillard, J. (1988), Selected Writings, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Baudrillard, J. (1998), The Consumer Society, Sage, London.
Capra, F. (1997), The Web of Life, Flamingo, London.

Christopher, M., Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. (1991), Relationship Marketing, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, P. and Gronhaug, K. (2005), Qualitative Marketing Research, Sage Publications, London.

Chakrabarti, R., Ramos, C. and Henneberg, S. (2013), “Network dynamics in the UK pharmaceutical network – a network-as-practice perspective”, Industrial MarketingManagement, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 356-371.

Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. (1996), Making Sense of Qualitative Data, Sage, Thousand Oaks,

CA. Collins, H.M (2001), “What is tacit knowledge?”, in Schatzki, T.R., Knorr Cetina, K. And Von Savigny, E. (Eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 107-119.

Corley, K.G. and Gioia, D.A. (2011), “Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution?”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 12-32.

Cornelissen, J. (2002), “Academic and practitioner theories of marketing”, Marketing Theory, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 133-143.

Carr, A. and Leivesley, R. (1995), “Metaphors in organization studies: a retreat to obscurantism or ideology in ‘drag’?”, Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 55-66.

Greenfield, T. (1993), “Re-forming and re-valuing educational administration: whence and when cometh the phoenix?”, in Greenfield, T. and Ribbins, P. (Eds), Greenfield on Educational Administration, Routledge, London, pp. 169-98.

Calhoun, C. (1996), Critical Social Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.

Carson, D. (1995), ``A comment on: the commodification of marketing knowledge'', Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 661-4.

Cooper, C. and Otley, D. (1998), ``The 1996 research assessment exercise for business and management'', British Journal of Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 73-90.

Denzin, N.K., Interpretive Ethnography, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 1997.

Denzin, N.K. dan Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Second Edition), Thousand Oaks: Sage Pul. Inc., 2000.

Drucker, P. (1987), The Frontiers of Management, Heinemann, London.

Day, G.S. and Montgomery, D.B. (1999), ``Charting new directions for marketing'', Journal of Marketing, Editorial, Special Issue, Vol. 63, pp. 3-13.

Dibb, S. and Stern, P. (1999), ``Research, rhetoric and reality: marketing's trifid'', in Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (Eds), Rethinking Marketing, Sage, London.

Dillon-Malone, P.J. (1970), ``A marketing approach to marketing education'', British Journal of Marketing, Vol. 4, pp. 215-19. Du

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case studies research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532-550.

Ehrensal, K.N. (1999), ``Critical management studies and the American business school culture: or, how not to get tenure in one easy publication'', paper presented at the Critical Management Studies Conference, Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester.

Elliott, R. and Jankell-Elliott, N. (2003), “Using ethnography in strategic consumer research”, Qualitative Research: An International Journal, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 215-223.

Emerson, R.M., Fretz, I.R. and Shaw, L.L. (1995), Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, University Press, Chicago, IL.

Fenton, S., Durkheim and Modern Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

Fuller, L. and Smith, V. (1991), ``Consumers' reports: management by customers in a changing economy'', Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1-16.

Fullerton, R. (1988), ``How modern is modern marketing? Marketing's evolution and the myth of the production era'', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, pp. 108-25.

Firat, A.F. (1997), ``Welcome to CMC'', Consumption, Markets and Culture, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-6.

Foxall, G.R. (1989), ``Marketing's domain'', European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 7-22.

Foxall, G.R. (1997), Marketing Psychology: The Paradigm in the Wings, Macmillan, London.

Foxall, G.R. (1998), ``Radical behaviorist interpretation: generating and evaluating an account of consumer behaviour'', The Behavior Analyst, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 321-54.

Farmer, R.N. (1967), ``Would your let your daughter marry a marketing man?'', Journal of Marketing, January, pp. 1-10.

Gilbert, D. and Bailey, N. (1990), ``The development of marketing ± a compendium of historical approaches'', Quarterly Review of Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 6-13

Guba, Egon (ed.) The Paradigm DiaIog. London Sage, 1990.

Gay, P. and Salaman, G. (1992), ``The culture of the consumer'', Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 615-33.

Gioia, DA & Pitre E. (1990), Multipradigm Perspectives on Theory Building, Academy of Management Review, Vol 15 No 4.

Greenfield, T. (1993), “The man who comes back through the door in the wall: discovering truth, discovering self, discovering organizations”, in Greenfield, T. and Ribbins, P. (Eds), Greenfield on Educational Administration, Routledge, London, pp. 92-121.

Graeff, T.R. (1997), ``Bringing reflective learning to the marketing research course: a cooperative learning project using intergroup critique'', Journal of Marketing Education, Spring, pp. 53-60.

GroÈnroos, C. (1994), ``From marketing mix to relationship marketing towards a paradigm shift in marketing'', Management Decision, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 1-19.

Groves, W.B. and Sampson, R.J. (1986), ``Critical theory and criminology'', Social Problems, Vol. 33, October/December, pp. 58-80.

Gummerson, E. (1994), ``Making relationship marketing operational'', International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 1-10.

Goulding, C. (2005), “Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: a comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39 Nos 3/4, pp. 294-308.

Goulding, C., Shankar, A. and Canniford, R. (2010), “Learning to be tribal: facilitating the formation of consumer tribes”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47 Nos 5/6, pp. 813-832.

Gummesson, E. (2000), Qualitative Methods in Management Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Gummesson, E. (2001), “Are current research approaches in marketing leading us astray?”, Marketing Theory, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 27-48.

Gist, R.R. (1974), Marketing and Society, Dryden Press, Hinsdale, IL. Gold, J.,

Habermas, J., Ilmu dan Teknologi sebagai Ideologi, Jakarta: LP3ES, 1990.

Hunt, S.D. (1994), ``On rethinking marketing: our discipline, our practice, our methods'', European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 3.

Hunt, S.D. (1995), ``On the marketing of marketing knowledge'', Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 635-9.

Heilman, E. (2003), “Critical theory as a personal project: from early idealism to academic realism”, Educational Theory, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 247-274.
Holbrook, M.B. (1985), “Why business is bad for consumer research: the three bears revisited”, in Hirschman, E.C. and Holbrook, M.B. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 145-156.

Hunt, S. (1983), Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science, Irwin, Homewood, IL.

Hunt, Shelby (1991), Modern Marketing Theory, Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Sciences, Ohio, South-Western Publishing Co.

Hult, G.T.M., Neese, W.T. and Bashaw, R.E. (1997), ``Faculty perceptions of marketing journals'', Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 37-52.

Hirschman, E.C. (1986), “Humanistic enquiry in marketing research: philosophy, method and criteria”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 237-49.

Holman, D. and Thorpe, R. (1999), ``The manager as a critical reflective practioner: uncovering arguments at work'', paper presented at the Critical Management Studies Conference, Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester

Halbert, M. (1965), The Meaning and Sources of Marketing Theory, McGraw-Hill Book Company, London.

Hetrick, W.P. and Lozada, H.R. (1999), ``Theory, ethical critique and the experience of marketing'', in Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (Eds), Rethinking Marketing,Sage, London.

Howard, D.G. and Ryans, J.K. (1993), ``What role should marketing theory play in marketing education: a cross-national comparison of marketing educators'', Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 29-43.

Hugstad, P. (1997), ``Marketing the marketing major'', Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 4-13.


Jackson, P. (2000) in Burton, D. (Ed.), Research Training for Social Scientists: A Handbook for Postgraduate Researchers, Sage, London.

Kassa, Y. dan M. Kemal (ed.), Participatory Research: An Emerging Alternative Methodology in Social Research, New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia, 1982.

Katsikeas, C.S., Robson, M.J. and Hulbert, J.M. (2004), “In search of relevance and rigour for research in marketing”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 568-578.

Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University, Chicago, IL.

Kim, A.E. (1996), ``Critical theory and the sociology of religion': a reassessment'', Social Compass: International Review of Sociology of Religion, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 267-83.
Kotler, P. (1972), ``A generic concept of marketing'', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36, April, pp. 46-54.

Kotler, P. and Levy, S.J. (1969), ``Broadening the concept of marketing'', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33, January, pp. 10-15.

Levy, S. (2003), “Roots of marketing and consumer research”, Consumption, Markets and Culture, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 99-110.

Lowe, S., Carr, A.N., Thomas, M. and Watkins-Mathys, L. (2005), “The fourth hermeneutic in marketing theory”, Marketing Theory, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 185-203.

Lowe, S. and Carr, A. (2003), “Paradigmapping and management as a moral art: clearing a path through the incommensurability debate in organisation and management studies”, in Biberman, J. and Alkhafaji, A. (Eds), Business Research Yearbook: Global Business Perspectives, McNaughton & Gunn, Lansing, MI

Lewis, M.W. and Grimes, A.J. (1999), “Metatriangulation: building theory from multiple paradigms”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 672-90.

Lamb, C.W. and Dunne, P.M. (Eds) (1980), Theoretical Developments in Marketing, AMA Conference Proceedings, Phoenix, AZ, 10-13 February.

Lash, S. (1990), The Sociology of Postmodernism, Routledge, London.

Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1987), The End of Organized Capitalism, Polity, Oxford.

Lazer, W. (1967), ``Some observation of the state of the art of marketing theory'', in Kelley, E.J. and

Lazer, W. (Eds), Managerial Marketing Perspectives and Viewpoints, Irwin, Homewood, IL.

Morgan, G. (1980), “Paradigms, metaphors and puzzle solving in organization theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 605-22.

Morgan, G. (1986), Images of Organization, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Morgan, G. (1992), ``Marketing discourse and practice: towards a critical analysis'', in Alvesson,

Morris, D. (1995), ``Do marketing professors really know marketing?'', Marketing News, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 4-5.

Mort, F. and Thompson, P. (1994), ``Retailing, commercial culture and masculinity in 1950s

McDonagh, P. (1995), ``Radical change through rigorous review? A commentary on the commodification of marketing knowledge'', Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 675-9.

Morrow, R., Critical Theory and Methodology, Nearbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, 1994.

McCarthy, T., Teori Kritis Jurgen Habermas, Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2006.

Neuman, W Lawrence (2000), Social Research Methods, Qualitative and

Ritzer, R., Modern Sociolical Theory (Fourth Edition), New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 1996.

O'Driscoll, A. and Murray, J.A. (1998), ``The changing nature of theory and practice in marketing: on the value of synchrony'', Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 14, pp. 391-416.

Patterson, A., Quinn, L. and Baron, S. (2012), “The power of intuitive thinking: a devalued heuristic of strategic marketing”, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 35-44.

Patton, M.Q. (1990), Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Perry, C., Riege, A. and Brown, L. (1999), “Realism’s role among scientific paradigms in marketing research”, Irish Marketing Review, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 16-23.

Prindle, J. (1994), ``Marketing ethics, macromarketing and the managerial perspective reconsidered'', Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 47-62.

Ray, L.J. (1993), Rethinking Critical Theory, Sage, London.

Reed, D. (1995), ``Critical theory and the Catholic church's ambivalence about capitalism'', International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 19-39.

Weber, M., The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Gloncoe: The Free Press.

Stake, R.E. (2005), “Qualitative case studies”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., Sage Publication, pp. 443-466.

Sheth, J.N., Gardner, D.M. and Garrett, D.E. (1988), Marketing Theory Evolution and Evaluation, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

Spillard, P. (1967), ``Education and research in marketing: the CNAA system'', British Journal of Marketing, Vol. 1, Autumn, pp. 29-41.

Vargo, Stephen L. and Robert F. Lusch (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 1–17.

Venkatesh, A. (1995), “Ethnoconsumerism: a new paradigm to study cultural and cross-cultural consumer behaviour”, in Costa, J. and Bamossy, G. (Eds), Marketing in a Multicultural World, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 126-41.
Zaltman, Gerald, Karen Lemasters dan Michael Heffring (1982), Theory Construction in Marketing, Some Thoughts on Thinking, Pittsburgh, John Wiley and Sons.

Van de Ven, A.H. and Johnson, P.E. (2006), “Knowledge for theory and practice”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 802-821.

Wilkinson, I. and Gray, D.M. (2007), “The production and consumption of marketing theory”, Australasian Marketing Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 39-52.

Zinkham, G.M. and Hirschheim, R. (1992), “Truth in marketing theory and research: an alternative perspective”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 80-88.

Thomas, M. (2002), “Thoughts on building a just market society”, Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 9-15.

Venkatesh, A. (1995), “Is marketing ready for Kuhn?”, in Dholakia, N. and Arndt, J. (Eds), Changing the Course of Marketing: Alternative Paradigms for Widening Marketing Theory, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 45-67.

Tetreault, M.A. (1987), ``Speculations on the sociology of marketing'', in Belk, R.W. and Zaltman, G. (Eds), Marketing Theory, AMA Winter Educators' Conference, San Antonio, TX.

Thomas, M. (1999), ``Commentary'', in Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (Eds), Rethinking Marketing, Sage, London.

Transfield, D. and Starkey, K. (1998), `The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: towards policy'', British Journal of Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 341-53.

Tucker, W.T. (1974), ``Future directions in marketing theory'', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, pp. 30-5.

Vink, N. (1992), ``Historical perspectives in marketing management: explicating experience'', Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 219-37.

Waitzkin, H. (1989), ``A critical theory of medical discourse: ideology, social control, and the processing of social context in medical encounters'', Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, Vol. 30, pp. 220-39.

Walker, B.J., Berry, L.L., Etzel, M.J., Laczniak, E.R., Muncy, J.A. and Swan, J.E. (1997), ``Building professionalism in marketing: the role of marketing educators'', in Belk, R.W. and Zaltman, G. (Eds), Marketing Theory, AMA Winter Educators' Conference, San Antonio, TX.

Walker, D.S. and Child, J. (1979), ``The development of professionalism as an issue in British marketing'', European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 27-54.

Watson, T.J. (1997), ``Theorizing managerial work: a pragmatic pluralist approach to interdisciplinary research'', British Journal of Management, Vol. 8, pp. 3-8.
Wensley, R. (1995), ``A critical review of research in marketing'', British Journal of Management, Vol. 6, pp. 63-82.

Wensley, R. (1999), ``Commentary'', in Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (Eds), Rethinking Marketing, Sage, London.

Williams, J.D. (1995), ``Review article'', Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXXII, May, pp. 239-45.

Willmott, H. (1999), ``On the idolization of markets and the denigration of marketers: some critical reflections on a professional paradox'', in Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. And Whittington, R. (Eds), Rethinking Marketing, Sage, London.

Zaltman, G. (1999), ``Commentary'', in Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. and Whittington, R. (Eds), Rethinking Marketing, Sage, London.

Zuckerman, M., Ellen, M. and Carsky, M.L. (1990), ``Contribution of women to US marketing thought: the consumers' perspective 1900-1940'', Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 313-18.
Published
2019-09-27
How to Cite
SUANDI, Edi. Dialektika Paradigma Ilmu Sosial Dalam Strategi Research Marketing. Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 15-29, sep. 2019. ISSN 2615-3300. Available at: <https://ojs.unitas-pdg.ac.id/index.php/manajemen/article/view/466>. Date accessed: 26 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.31317/jmk.10.3.15-29.2019.